Internship: Chronicle of Higher Education

Team: This is the fantastic, flagship publication covering major current issues in higher education. I hope you’ll review this opportunity and apply. The deadline is Oct. 3.

The Chronicle of Higher Education is seeking four interns—three editorial and one multimedia—for the Spring 2015 session. The internships will begin in January and last through May.

The Chronicle’s internships aim to give current undergraduates and recent college graduates the opportunity to gain professional experience at the No. 1 source for news about higher education.

Applicants must show a strong interest in pursuing a career in journalism with relevant coursework or prior experience.

The internships are full time in our Washington, D.C., office. In addition to a $500 weekly stipend, academic credit can often be arranged.

Find job descriptions and application details here.

Friday Funday

Hey there, Shorthorn staff! I just wanted to say, again, how excited I am for this semester. You each played a huge role in making this week go smoothly for us and for readers. Sure, we have some places to grow, some big stories to write, and some fantastic plans for the print and web editions. We’re in a great place to do or try anything you want. It’s exciting.

Our good work from this week

We had a bunch of shout outs, given the quality of and hard work you put toward content. Here are our top two awards:

Lorraine Frajkor earned the Best of the Week award, for her work on the semester’s first Pulse cover. It was creative and used color blocks and images well, uniting a topic that had wide variety. Nice job!

Joel Cooley earned Rookie of the Week, for attacking his beat (Administration II) and writing three focused stories – and two briefs – to cover what needed to be covered. Good hustle, and a very strong start.

And, your challenges for the week ahead:

Reporters (all): We had some wordy, unclear ledes this week, which impacted how a reader could have interpreted what the story is about. A good lede needs to do three things: summarize the story, using specific information gathered while reporting the story, get the reader’s interest, and set the tone for the story. This week, I’d like you to focus on your lede in each story. Does it do each of these things? Your staff manual contains a great checklist for ledes – it’s on pages E-7 to E-12.
BONUS: Lloyd’s lecture on sources hit the nail on the head – I’ll post highlights on the blog. To follow up, though, I issue this challenge (any reporter is eligible): Find, talk to, and get contact information (name, e-mail and phone number) from as many people on your beat as you can between now and next staff meeting. We’ll talk about how they compare to the levels of sources that Lloyd talked about – and whoever has collects the most information will get a fabulous prize. Extra bonus? You’ll have contacts on file for your next stories.

Photographers: Let’s push to be a true reflection of what’s happening on campus. As Will said: Let’s get more faces and the fronts of people in action. The content and subject of your images matters – coordinate with the reporter to tell the best story you can, together.

Design: We’ve done a good job of giving the reader multiple entry points on the front page and section fronts. This week, focus on inside page design, specifically hierarchy and flow. For Monday’s training session, please come prepared to talk about inside page design and challenges you face in designing them.

Online: Your mission is pretty clear – keep uploading previous content and focusing on getting links (internal and external) with stories. You’re working out the kinks on the site, and we’re grateful.

Copy desk: We had some good headlines this week, and some that needed a bit of work. Your challenge? Read every word of Lloyd’s headline critique, posted outside my office. Apply what you learn this week. Really hoping to see headlines that better fit the story and accurately describe the action taking place.

Everyone: Style, style, style. Dustin stressed that he wanted all staffers to refer to The Shorthorn’s style guide, the AP Stylebook and the dictionary, rather than ask a neighbor, for the guidelines/rules to apply to text. Please do this with vigor. It’ll improve your stories.

Thanks again, all! Have a great weekend!

-BLF

 

EIC application is up!!

EIC flier

I’m happy to announce we have one application for editor in chief for the summer and fall semesters. Mark Bauer’s application is available for you to look at, posted on the small conference room window. Also, see the attached flier (link above) for information on our meeting at 3:30 p.m. tomorrow (Thursday) to interview Mark.

Also, if you’re interested in applying for a section editor position, please see me for an application. If you want more information or have questions about any position on staff, now is the time to ask!

Webcast Critique, 04.06.10 and 04.07.10

Here are some notes from the 4/6/10 webcast:


  • We had some issues with reading the news. Voice, tone and appearance seem as though we were mocking the news. Anyone on camera needs to take it seriously – I know we does, but the perception of this performance is that we was having too much fun before and during the shoots. Perception is reality. Have anchors focus, and don’t use takes that appear silly.
  • Volume throughout the webcast was jumbled. It was generally too soft, and at some points it jumped higher. BE CONSISTENT. If, in editing, you aren’t checking volume levels, do so starting now. It needs to be consistent.
  • We’ve talked about needing more natural sound, and I was glad to have it in the Food Fair piece. But, it competed mightily with the VO from Chase. Again, watch volume.
  • Really needed some video with the volunteers package, other than the interview (which was good, because it didn’t just have facts about when and where). The sign-up sheet, people volunteering or preparing for the upcoming volunteer efforts, shots at potential volunteer sites (listed on the Big Event website) would have been good. Remember – we need to SHOW stories, not just our faces.
  • Residence Hall story: The panning killed me on this. Stop panning quickly. Stop running video that is subpar.
  • Advising story: Intro felt like mocking, again. Don’t run or reshoot.


Notes on the 4/7/10 webcast:

  • First thing I noticed was that the office lights in the background were off … Making the set look dead. Let’s remember that part of filming in the newsroom is to get the hustle of you guys as you work stories … And we aren’t showing that. Filming earlier (and meeting the 7 p.m.post deadline) would take care of that.
  • Again, the volume from piece to piece varies to the point of being noticeable – not what we want.
  • Overall, we’re spending too long with the anchor, not enough time with visuals on the story. As a guideline
  • Food display: Really needed another perspective (someone who learned something from the display), and needed a video of Frenchy the French Fry Dude. We mention him, and I want to see him.
  • Packaging: We had two stories related to I-Week, and they weren’t packaged together. Just like in the print edition, put the two together for ease of use. Also, use bugs at bottom to provide dates/times for events. The second item on the fashion show really needed some reporting – the basic 5Ws and H weren’t answered. We need the basics.
  • Science story: Get video of the participants and what they said!! The story isn’t that a forum was held. It’s that people brought WHAT issues to the table to discuss?
  • Any reason we didn’t tease to Pulse content?

Thanks, guys, for your hard work. Let’s fix these little things to make it great. It seems like the big issue is getting video – get it early! We should be using overnight budget to plan out what we’re shooting. Reporters, get info to Vin early to ensure you get the best video for stories.

The Line. 04.01.10

Here are some notes on this issue of The Shorthorn:

Best headline:

Rance Pringle’s “Round Two of the Fight Begins” in Pulse. The headline sums up the story – after a Battle of the Bands appearance, a Street Fighter-inspired band is hosting a CD release party. Round two, anyone? Nice work.

Lesson: Headlines need to summarize the stories they are selling, but in doing so need to remain specific. This headline does that, while several others do not. We are padding (adding unnecessary words to) headlines throughout the paper. These are marked in yellow highlighter on the page.

Best quote:

Chris Hunt did something great in his construction update-he found a former UTA student who plans to attend classes here again. Until then, he’s working construction toward the Engineering Complex: “I think it’s cool that I’m helping build a building that I’ll be studying in.” Great perspective, and good source find. It helped layer the story.

Lesson: Find people relevant to your stories. If you are writing about a student program, talk to the students involved or impacted. Think about the stakeholders from all angles, and get them represented.

Best lede:

Monica Nagy’s “Those who want to avoid a D or F my prefer a W.” Any idea what this is about? The drop date is looming, the play off of letter grades enhances the impact on  students (nice use of the word “avoid”). I think we all can relate to this lede, which also makes it an instant hit. Great!

Lesson: Ledes don’t have to be long or complicated to get the news across. With every story, focus on what impacts readers. Often, that doesn’t include background. Put the newest or most newsworthy information at the top of the story, and structure your story around the lede.

Best thing in today’s paper:

Justin Sharp and Thea Blesener’s graphic on The Science of Bed Racing (page 2). This was a unique angle on an annual event that put the experts in the position to give advice for a fun event. The advice is practical and provides another layer to telling the story.

Question/challenge: What other experts could we have consulted on EVERY story in this paper to add depth to stories?

-BF

The Line. 03.31.10

Here are some notes on this issue of The Shorthorn:

Best headline:

Group tumbles into town next week (by Mark Reeder)

The verb does all the work here – tumbles is specific, sets the tone for the article and paints a picture, all in one. Nice job.

Lesson from other headlines: We’re losing specificity in headlines. Remember the key-word method and focus on what makes each story unique. You aren’t just selling a story, you are selling THIS story.

Best story find:

Great beat reporting from Joan Khalaf on her Phi Gamma Delta story regarding an incident that is impacting the fraternity’s involvement on campus for the rest of the semester. The story, although it does not include details of what happened, reflects good source building and hustle in trying to get the info to the public. Joan’s next step will be to push this story forward with more details, including police reports (that we can link to online) about the incident. This is the start of a compelling story to tell, and it started at the beginning of the semester with good source building and reporting in previous stories. Nice job finding this story.

Lesson from this: Joan found a real newsy story from her beat reporting, and jumped on it. Let’s jump on news as soon as we find out about it. We’ve been sitting on stories (like the SG filing deadline and candidates, among others) and need to get the info out as soon as possible. Don’t wait.

Best bounce back

Today’s editorial was a well-written piece that, well, I wish we didn’t have to write. The editorial faced challenges – correcting some not-so-great journalism done in Friday’s editorial stance, as well as restating its original intent. The Shorthorn editorial board took its medicine, and hopefully that will help ailing relationship with some fellow students. However, it’s important to note that this relationship started to break when we decided that something that impacts the entire student body wasn’t “newsworthy.” The lesson? Decisions you make about what goes in – or doesn’t – the paper affects your readers. From beat reports to story pitches to the budget meeting, consider your audience. What’s interesting or newsworthy to them might not be to you – and that’s perspective to include in all of your decision making. Nice sentiment in the editorial, guys.

Best thing in today’s paper:

Rasy Ran’s photo package on Page 6. The three images worked together to show different aspects of the Greek Week events, which painted a more accurate representation of the day. This, and he got video for the webcast. Nice work. Also, kudos to design for packaging this well. Curious, though – why is the best thing in the paper on the back page?

Thing to work on:

Ledes: We are backing into stories. In several stories (Bill simplifies student loan process, Hadron collider, Mavs fall, Coordinator shares tips on recycling, architecture brief, SC revisions), we gave too much background, stated the obvious or made sweeping statements instead of saying what was new in the story. Remember that the lede sells the story – it must summarize, entice, state impact and draw people in. If it doesn’t, it’s time to rewrite. Ask yourself: Why does my reader care about this story? Answer it in that first graph.

Remember, we have a lede contest going on. So far, there are no entries for this week. Fabulous prizes await …

-BF